This limitation and thus the continued dependence on 'serve' might force me to consider one of the other applications out there, listed on the page Haml Sucks for Content. I might have to manually compile all the files using the terminal command, and hope the Haml interpreter can handle combining template files with each file, which I seriously doubt at this stage. This is a feature in middleman, but middleman still refuses to run because a dependency of it, thin, refuses to work on 64 bits. This workflow is nice for now, although it doesn't have any built-in method to build the entire site into a static site when I'm done and want to deploy. I'm going to be using either Coda's live preview, or the minimalist browser called Playground, which eliminates the need to press refresh when the local file it is displaying changes. This includes HAML, Sass, Slim, Markdown, etc. I'm using my normal editors, along with 'serve', a Ruby gem that runs a web server using WEBrick, and automatically compiles any files which it detects has changed. OK, for anyone else looking for an answer to this, I decided to go along with a different solution. Coda? It looks pretty, but doesn't get the job done so much any more (though Panic's Transmit is still very much a core application).
#Coda 2 sass plugin how to
I used to use BBEdit when I needed to do complex regular expression-style search and replacements, but then I discovered how to do the same thing in TextMate, so BBEdit is sort of collecting dust.
#Coda 2 sass plugin code
While I use RubyMine as my primary tool, I find that TextMate still gets a lot of use when I'm programming and need a quick, friendly window to examine code in. P.S.: I'm a paid user on all the platforms I mentioned. Some information on the plugin for BBEdit is in BBEdit-Codeless-Language-Module-for-HAML-SASS. The third option would be BBEdit, which can also handle both Haml and Sass. I know you're not using Ruby, so maybe the idea of using a tool made primarily for Ruby doesn't appeal, but it does work in both the Haml and Sass environments very nicely. That said, for roughly the cost of TextMate you can purchase RubyMine ($69), which does both Haml (via RubyGem) and Sass (via Plugin), and can also handle running Sass -watch internally. Installing HAML bundle for TextMate is a primer on how to setup TextMate for Haml/Sass, and I suspect there are others.
It doesn't do Haml or Sass "right out of the box", but it can be configured to do so using "Bundles." Who knows, perhaps that'll be included.įor now, since you're not using Ruby on Rails, I might suggest TextMate.
I've been closely following the Coda forums, as I am a paid user, and it looks as though a 2.0 version is forthcoming. I think it’d be great if we could have bot syntax and code competition that fits our Angular needs. Coda 2 comprises all you would expect from an IDE: it supports multiple languages (including all the standards) it performs autocomplete of project names, as well as language functions it supports SVN and GIT it has good support for plugins (or you can write your own) it has a configurable editor and it has a built-in preview. However, Coda does not provide any support for Haml or Sass that I can find. I love the new Coda 2.5, it has great improvements over the first release of Coda 2 however there is one huge thing that it’s missing and that is more Angular integration. I don't use Espresso, so no comment there.
0 kommentar(er)
